Group Forums >> Love At Inside Tech >> Friends First Or Sex First?
Friends First Or Sex First?
|
2760 posts back to top |
Posted 5 months ago What is your experience? Unleash Your Mustang Side! |
|
1355 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I have had both. In my experience friends first works best. Sometimes friendship blossoms into Love and when sex comes it is a sweet reward for the happiness you feel. Sex can be just sex, no emotions, but when sex is involved with someone you Love, and the first time, it is magical. When there is sex first it can ge awkward. You then have to continue to impress the person, trying not to show them it was just lust that drove you to them. The forgetful fishy........I think??!!?? |
|
1 post back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Dori is right. SEX is just a craving need for most of the people who don't bother about the other person or emotions. It's almost like a one way traffic. Wham bam, thank you ma'am stuff. But if it's between two loving persons, it is an entirely different ballgame altogether. Of course, although the age old adage says that "Love at first sight", we still need to make friends with that person and it can be followed by sex (mutual consent of course). Oops, I was boring, was I?
|
|
4 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I agree with both of you. However I fell in love with my husband after we "did the do", and became best friends, then lived in sin together, then we married after a 5 year engagement. I know weird scenario but true. |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago My own personal experience based on two marriages is casual sex can lead to friendship, which leads to better sex, which leads to living together, and then finally marriage. First time around the marriage was aweful because our friendship was superficial. The second time we truly were friends and have no been married for 21 years. I guess in general I'm in the friends first camp, though a little casual sex before hand can ensure some degree of compatability before the "living in sin" stage. |
|
1355 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I agree with you Enabler, I don't think that sex should be counted out. It is a part of the relationship. If the desire is not there, then there is no attraction. I have had my share of jump into bed first relationships. I admit it, I am not the squeeky clean, innocent, naive little fishy I might come across as (please don't laugh too hard at that). There was a time, in my very early 20's, that I thought the only way to get a man to Love me was through sex. Oh how wrong I was! I think the point of this topic is desire or respect first? We can all succomb to our desires and just blast into it. Sometimes you just can't help it and the carnal lust takes over. So what, we are all adults and know it happens. I am not saying that friends, who become Lovers, do not have these desires, nor should they ignore them. It is a part of what we are, animals. Yup, we are animals too. Some people, especially women, think that once they have sex the other person is now theirs and will take care of them forever. This of course leads to a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings. I have been down that road. I am 42 years old and never want to have to do that again. I know that if I just wanted to satiate my carnal lust, I could, no strings attached. I know there are men out there who are into the wham-bam-thank you ma'am.How much control we have over our personal lust is at question. Do we care for the other person enough to get to know them before hopping in to bed, or do we just go for it? The forgetful fishy........I think??!!?? |
|
2760 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Friends first. I'm not just getting older, I'm getting wiser. I gotta lot to give and I'm not just gonna whore it out anymore. Unleash Your Mustang Side! |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago LMAO! Whore it out? That perhaps was my problem when I met my first wife. I was such a whore that I didn't give us a chance to become friends first. On the other hand, she was a bitch. |
|
73 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago tlwalters says ...
Not weird at all. However, it only took me a 6 month engagement to decide that this was the man I wanted to wake up beside every morning. |
|
862 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago How about neither? I choose a life of friendless purity.
tlwalters, don't feel bad. My man and I are living together. We just can't tell my Baptist preacher father ;) "And so, the lion fell in love with the lamb..." |
|
38 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago both but since my gf and i havent together for 2 1/2 years theres no more of this situation 4 me |
|
862 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago haven't what together, TireRackIT? You left out the best part!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "And so, the lion fell in love with the lamb..." |
|
38 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago oops, typo. we have been together for 2 1/2 years im not in that situation anymore |
|
862 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Ahhh gotcha. Congrats on the long term. :D "And so, the lion fell in love with the lamb..." |
|
38 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago thanks. |
|
10 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago
friends first |
|
132 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago My order is: friends first, Marriage next, then sex. I'm a bit old fashioned I guess. Jesus paid it all... |
|
379 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago With friends first you are already comfortable with each other and you have a deep emotional raport. Little things come easy and naturally like kissing the nape of her neck while she's reading the paper or running your fingers through her hair while you watch a movie together. On the other hand there is nothing more exciting than meeting someone elses gaze and seeing that shared look of mutual lust, then racing off to indulge your carnal passions. Which leads to a third category that combines both of these... meeting someone online and then finding when you meet you can't keep your hands off each other. |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Like Cyril, I used to be rather old fashioned regarding this issue. However, I find that the best method (at least for me) is both together. My best relationship, we met went our separate ways for the day and got together that night to finish the meeting phase. We fell asleep in each other's arms (so technically, I guess one could say that we slept together upon first meeting). Anyway, the sex part came along with the friendship. We simply were NOT trying either way. That is to say, we were not trying to avoid it until it was time, nor were we trying to press it. In actuality (if my sweetheart doesn't mind) our first was during our first 'real' date. We went camping, and the night air and campfire were just too much and... well, as they say it is history. ;) Consequently, my advice would have to be, let it happen naturally. Do NOT go into the relationship trying either to seek it, or to avoid it. Permit life to take it's natural course with your relationship. |
|
120 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Yeah, Normally if its Sex first the relationship ends up being nothing more then another booty call..
Thats why the Bar or nightclubs are not always the best places to meet woman |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Deathrow_Nzl says ...
I think you mean to say, Deathrow, that bars are not the best places to meet a woman for a serious relationship. However, bars are a great place to meet a woman if your expectations are low. LOL. Have fun. |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Now Enabler, let's not be judgemental... one must define what one means by 'low' expectations. As the moral terpitude pendulum swings, we old ... may not be the defining standard anymore. :) |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Who're you calling old, Pilgrim? When I'm dead and buried, then I'll be old, not to mention ripe. "Low expectations". By that I meant "with no reasonable expectation of a long term, meaningful relationship". On the other hand (there's always another hand, have you noticed?), by no "reasonable" expectation, I didn't mean to imply that a good solid monogamous relationship couldn't be found in a bar, but that the probability is low, but definitely not zero. So I endeavor not to judge, lest I too be judged in turn. Amen. |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Empressively good catch enabler... ;) |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago By the way, I believe the saying goes... "You're only as old as the woman you feel..." :) Implying, keep her young and the world will obviously be much rosier. |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago I'm trying, Moldy. I'm trying. I chase her around whenever she will let me. LOL. (She's very strong, so I've got to be careful.) |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Moldy01 says ...
Thanks. I should have been a lawyer. Now that is a job, short of malfeasance, nonfeasance, misfeasance or gross moral turpitude, that you have for life. BTW, I did attend law school for a year and a half in 1999-91, but dropped out because I found it boring. That's the dumbest thing I ever did. I wanted to return to engineering. Stupid, stupid, stupid. My sister is an attorney, and she is bored and hates it, but she enjoys the security that comes with the profession. Stupid, stupid, stupid. That's okay. I chose what I loved, engineering, over money. (Stupid, stupid, stupid). |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago My experience tells me that if you're bored with what you choose to do, you won't be nearly as good at it as you would be at something that you're really interested in. So, money aside, I believe that your choice was the better one. Now, if we bring money back into the picture... and admitting that I did a similar change back some years ago... "stupid, stupid, stupid..." :) |
|
2673 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Well, I did love what I was doing, then it went overseas, and then along came the super recession we're in now. After the dust settles on the recession, I'll be able to determine if I can work until I retire, or I'm retired before I want to stop working. I know a lot of process engineers in the latter position. I think (actually, I know) it's time to morph again. |
|
1093 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Being in the middle of this "Super Recession" and having 'Lots" of free time on my hands at this time, I can safely say that retirement is NOT on the Horizon for me at this time. I'm MORE than bored, and have a LOT of energy to share yet. Consequently, I'm looking for the next opportunity (which may also include some form of a Morph as well).
To keep the subject matter (well close anyway), I've had the friendly job, and now I've been screwed by the job, I'm looking forward to a 'friendly' atmosphere again. :) |
