General Forums >> The OS Debate >> Mac or PC

+2

Mac or PC

1,097 Views
55 Replies Flag as inappropriate
Valerie_max50

3 posts

back to top

Posted over 2 years ago

 

Do you prefer Macs or PCs?

Valerie_max50

3 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

I use both and enjoy using both. In fact at this point I really don't see much of a difference between the two. They are more similar than different, in my opinion.

419305256403_0_sm_max50

120 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Macs are for nerd boys!

Wake_surfing_max50

3 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Holy grail of computing: A mac with BootCamp/Parallels to run windows and whatever x86 you want, and you can set up a dual boot for Linux. Pretty much covers all the bases, I think?

N9900304_30562805_2675_max50

15 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Everybody knows that Sun Microsystems makes the best computers and OS. Can't beat Snake Race.

Photo_83_max50

6 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

It depends, for gaming it's hard to beat what PC has to offer. But for usability, it's hard to beat Mac. All the apps are just so slick! And they don't cost hundreds of dollars. Quicksilver alone is priceless.

Badass4_max50

6 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Macs work too well - that is their problem. Since when is computing supposed to be a comforting and pleasurable experience? Only the American softies believe this. That's also why Macs don't sell in Europe.

Haley2_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Definitely PC, but I think I could get used to Macs someday....

Img_0154_max50

6 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

PC for servers and workstations, but definitely Mac for laptops.

Even the best sony laptop isn't as all-over well designed as a macbook pro.

Apple's spent a huge amount to make a user friendly and attractive computer. They've succeeded as far as I'm concerned.

Give me a PC any day though, for a server, or a custom built workstation. There's a greater variety of parts available, and they're cheaper.

Images-2_max50

4 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

PCs are practical, but Macs are cooler. I would rather be cool than practical :>)

However, I'm still pissed that Yahoo! videos don't play on Macs. With all the money and talent that Yahoo! has you would think they would make everything run on both.

Beach2_max50

152 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

I'm such a Mac lover at heart I can't toss out any that I've bought in the past 20 years from my first one, the Mac 128K to the last iMac I pulled in -- they're basically just museum pieces wedged between the three PC desktops (I don't discriminate.. HP/Dell/Compaq) I've been using over the past 10 years. Every now and then I think about carting them up but I can't.

Me_upload1_max50

157 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

I'm with Greenar on this... at least in part. I've used both Mac and PC, though I haven't touched a Mac in a few years... ever since they came out with that thing that looked like a Disney version of my old TRASH80 Model III. I haven't gotten off the meds, yet!
Honestly, though, I've been building my own (and for others) for about 10 years. The only real option IS a PC. When I can build a monster-box that will kick Dell's butt for 1/3 the price, why would I choose anything else?
Besides - being a Linux fanatic, I'm not overly fond of the PowerPC chip architecture. And now that Apple has gone over to the Dark Side (a.k.a. Intel) why bother? It's just another over-priced proprietary PC.

N71108236_21742_max50

10 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

p.s. launchy is a fantastic quicksilver "clone" for windows xp. i use "clone" instead of clone because xp does not support application services the same way as os x, and thus the magic of quicksilver is lost. even so, launchy is a wildly useful “keystroke launcher” with a cornucopia of useful built-in applets.

12_10_06_1428_max50

19 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Wow Good Points in this discussion but I Havn't ever used a Mac so I couldn't Judge it. But I Do know alot about PCs and I Totally agree With you Scott you can Built Monster PCs And Mac pansies

100_1812_max50

6 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

MacOsX is the perfect GUI for UNIX, this is the reason why I have used OSX since day 1.
I leave my Macs on 24/7, rebooting once a month and I NEVER crash! It is always solid 100%.

Software Development is getting easier on a Mac with XCode, Eclipse, MySql all runnable on OsX.

I am forced to use a PC for work as a Software Engineer, if it wasn't for that I would have no need for Windows at all.

Seamus_max50

10 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

The Mac is the Corelle dish of the computer world: Hardly ever breaks, but when it does, it's a Hell of a mess. I'd rather be able to customize and touch up my own system without having to worry about proprietary components, thanks.

slburkey makes some great points; someone mentioned Parallels and Boot Camp for x86 architecture, but they really don't do Windows properly. Parallels is pathetic and Boot Camp only loads a few necessary libraries, but not enough to call it "Windows".

For home use I prefer XP, and I think I'll avoid Vista until it either dies or they release SP2, though so far I'm not impressed.

100_1812_max50

6 posts

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Seamus said:

The Mac is the Corelle dish of the computer world: Hardly ever breaks, but when it does, it's a Hell of a mess. I'd rather be able to customize and touch up my own system without having to worry about proprietary components, thanks.

slburkey makes some great points; someone mentioned Parallels and Boot Camp for x86 architecture, but they really don't do Windows properly. Parallels is pathetic and Boot Camp only loads a few necessary libraries, but not enough to call it "Windows".

For home use I prefer XP, and I think I'll avoid Vista until it either dies or they release SP2, though so far I'm not impressed.

"The Mac is the Corelle dish of the computer world: Hardly ever breaks, but when it does, it’s a Hell of a me"

Not really, if it breaks you take it in to a Apple Genius Bar and have it replaced or buy a new part.

If you like tinkering with machines and have the hours to be your own tech support, then go PC. I used to do that, but I don't have the time anymore, Macs are the supreme machine for productivity IMO.

Being in IT, Tech savvy and using a Mac is king of like being a mechanic that drives a BMW under warranty. I could fix it, but why when I could be stress free?

Seamus_max50

10 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Rock_Whitney, you've got some valid points, but a techs' computer hardly ever breaks in the first place, no matter the platform.

As far as I'm concerned, proprietary is bad.

That said, I don't dislike Mac or Linux, though I do find OS wars somewhat humorous.

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

All you Pee Cee loyalists are just plain scared of the power of MAC. Did you know that Apple has sold millions and millions of servers for science. And also for those that built super computers? Many busienesses converted to Macs. Windows OS has sucked from day one! Plug and play on a Pee Cee is like a huge promise that always gets broken. Plug and play on a Mac means that you have two steps ie: Plug it in for power and use your hardware. No I/O conflicts or drivers that can't be found. Macs run like the hand built Rolls Royce. Why buy a computer that you seldom have problems with when you can buy a PC (Piece of Crap) like everyone else.

Seamus_max50

10 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

PowerGS, you're on the wrong website, man. You want the Geek section of fark.com. We were having a nice, civilized discussion and now here's this PC-bashing thing. Even I wasn't trying to trash the Mac platform, I was just sort of inviting comparison.

I really don't want to see this turn into yet another Battle-of-the-fanboys flamewar.

Thrors_map_max50

51 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

Chris -- Thanks for the tip on launchy. I'll give it a try. Personally, I'll take a Linux server over windows anyday. I'm using Vista in preference to mac, but that's just b/c I'm a creature of habit, and don't want to learn a new text editor. :) we'll see how the new mac 10.5 goes. Can't wait to install it at home.

Rest_04192008_01_max50

58 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted over 2 years ago

 

As to Mac's PNP, it's pretty easy for it to work well when everything is proprietary and Apple can control the hardware. The advantage of the PC, and Linux as well, is choice (sometimes too much choice :> )

I build my own systems and have been happy with that. I will say that I was happy when Mac went with the FreeBSD variant for OSX. Even though they proprietarized (if that's a word :> ) it, it's still better than their old OS.

BTW, my daughter has a Mac laptop and loves it. She only uses her HP laptop for some of her schoolwork.

Oh, yeah... Stop with the flaming already. I agree, lets keep this a nice civil conversation. :>>>

Photo_user_blank_big

9 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

Considering the most recent windows OS release, I'm starting to lean more towards apple. Unless microsoft does a total recall vista and the DRM, IRAA lawsuit machine I'm inclined to start opting to support another competing company. I for one don't really appreciate getting a "you can't do this with your device," list after spending thousands of dollars on a machine that I now own. It seems even linux is running down that road as well. Apple is to some extent, but it seems out of all of them apple is the only one that's fighting the DRM machine.

I for one don't appreciate being told what to do in my own home with my own property.

Rest_04192008_01_max50

58 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

I agree supabean. Although I would think that Apple is more likely to go down the DRM road than Linux. Most of the Linux people I know (as well as from what I've read) HATE DRM and are trying as best possible to keep it OUT of Linux. But MS does seem to be welcoming it with open arms. I too will be staying FAR AWAY from Vista. Unfortunately it may not be completely possible to keep DRM out of ANY OS. I guess time will tell.

Scott-shootout_max50

75 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

Given Mac vs Windows, I go Windows every time. Why? A few years ago when I was using Macs fairly regularly, I could freeze one up in 5 seconds flat (and I wasn't trying to). Granted, that was several OS's ago, but while everyone around me was preaching that Macs were impossible to crash and Windows computers crashed constantly, I was having exactly the opposite experience. I still rarely have a Windows crash and I have few complaints with either XP or Vista.

That said, I have recently had my first real experience with Linux (via Ubuntu running as VMWare on my Vista computer) and I've really liked it. It would be nice to use a computer running nothing but Linux for a while to try it out, but I don't want to risk messing up the stable Vista installation I have and I don't have another computer to run a different operating system on.

Middle_finger_flame_max50

1 post

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

Jon_Wirt said:

Macs are for nerd boys!

DELETE MY FUCKING ACCOUNT
DELETE MY FUCKING ACCOUNT
DELETE MY FUCKING ACCOUNT
DELETE MY FUCKING ACCOUNTDELETE MY FUCKING ACCOUNT

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 year ago

 

The Mac OS is way ahead of it's time, if you are a mac user and a geek you would know that it's like having 2 OS's in 1, The aqua graphical interface that's easy to use and for the geeks, the rock solid darwin Unix environment via the terminal. Even the most hard core Linux guys have got to appreciate the Unix core of Mac OS because after all Linux was modeled after Unix which has been around since the dawn of Computers. Just my 2 cents.

Cheers

Photo_user_blank_big

1 post

back to top
+1

Rated: +1 | Posted about 1 year ago

 

I use both or should i say all three Mac, PC (windows), and Linux. In my opinion the mac computers are by far the most advanced and not only do they work but they rarely fail. That is a good thing. Me personally i prefer Ubuntu to all of them and Ubuntu can run on either PC or Mac!! and gives many options to play with. But if i couldn't use Ubuntu i would defiantly go with a mac over a PC.

Pilot_max50

5 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

I use PC (Windows Vista and XP), Apple (Mac OS X), Linux, and various other OS's but I prefer Windows Vista for gaming (DirectX 10). Apple OS X is a completely overhyped and very proprietory OS with so many restrictions.
The one good thing about the Mac is that the OS is very intuitive! But for a gamer and a hardware modder like me, Windows and Linux are preferable over the Mac OS.

Img00252_max50

8 posts

back to top
Rate

Rate This | Posted about 1 year ago

 

MAC if you got $$ - you got to fork our more money for the MAC and it's software - if you got it, get one!


Vista is a resource hog and doesnt work on some hardware - I am impressed with the new interface.


XP  - is really the only option for those of us that need programs that only run on windows.


Linux Rocks - Try MintLinux and gOS, you might be impressed!


I miss OS2!

Next Page >