General Forums >> The OS Debate >> Linux vs ALL
Linux vs ALL
|
175 posts back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago Also, it's no-longer possible to compare Windows with Linux. Linux can/should be considered a Hypervisor now. http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6503/ That is you should be comparing Linux to VMware's ESX/3I/whatever or RedHat's Xen. I'm told Microsoft has it's own VM solution in the mix, but I don't fore a second believe it will be based on the existing Kernel the way Linux's KVM is. I'm not sure how Xen fits into the mix, but I mite imagine the MS product being something along the same lines. I'm not saying this makes Linux king of the hill, I'm just saying any comparison to a non-hypervising OS is a slant(leaving out critical points) to begin with. http://insidetech.monster.com/topics/2156-kvm-qemu-for-xp/posts
|
|
9 posts back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago I am an avid supporter of Open Source. Linux has always been Open Source. Just about anything you can buy is available on the Open Source Project. Many flavors of Linux now have very nice GUI's these days and yes it packs a lot of power using less resources. I have Knoppix on a VirtualBox and have in the past used SUSE and RedHat. They ran just fine in that environment only allocating them 512 Memory. Granted this didn't have real world traffic or user load. Just a personal learning server. Just a little tidbit here, once I read that if the US Gov't. used Linux and stopped paying license fees to MS they would save 1 Trillion dollars in the first year! Go figure? |
|
175 posts back to top |
| Posted 6 months ago Some would argue that RedHat, and perhaps other distros, cost much more then Windows. Organisations should be looking at software like Knoppix or Debian, not only to cut costs but for all the reasons to choose Free Software. CentOS is a Free, as in Beer, replacement for RedHat.
|
|
175 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago cheako says ...
|
|
175 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago The discussion continues over at: Group Forums >> Geeks Like Me >> linux gmanon says ...
Here is the /real/ problem, they are both the same. When Front Page breaks you don't know how to fix it, you have to learn how to fix it. When notepad breaks it's because you typed something wrong, but still "you don't know how to fix it, you have to lean how to fix it." They are identical, it's just that ppl will always figure out what they did wrong, but what if some one else is to blame? Bottom line, if you feel they are different it could be because you are a finger pointer and don't take it upon your self to fix some one else's work. If you feel this way, I suggest you try and remember who it was that clicked on the Front Page icon in the first place? That way you will click on Notepad, because no matter what icon you click on the problem is still yours and you will have to fix it.
Same for Linux VS Windows, learn how to fix Windows is just as hard as learning how to fix Linux. Still Linux makes these tasks simpler(IMHO). Here is something I should have pointed out sooner. If you would consider Ubuntu/RedHat/SUSE/or Windows you should read this first, it's designed to wash your brain. http://www.debian.org/intro/about
I'm still not convinced.Don't take our word for it - try Debian yourself. Since hard disk space has become less expensive, you can probably spare about 2GB. If you don't want or need a graphical desktop, 600MB are sufficient. Debian can be easily installed on this extra space and can coexist with your existing OS. If you eventually need more space, you can simply delete one of your OSes (and after you see the power of a Debian system, we are confident you won't delete Debian). As trying a new operating system will take some of your valuable time, it is understandable that you may have reservations. For this reason we compiled a list of pros and cons of Debian. This should help you decide whether you think it's worth it. We hope you'll appreciate our honesty and frankness.
|
|
64 posts back to top |
| Posted 3 months ago I Use Linux for all of my requirements i use Centos and Debian for my study and network usage i use ubuntu maximum it is my favorite. i never uses Windows and any other OS on my personal computer |
|
40 posts back to top |
| Posted 2 months ago I would agree with you, except that as a programmer I "HAVE" to have a Windows machine around to program for it. :) Pete harendrakumar says ...
DigiOz Multimedia | www.digioz.com |
