Group Forums >> Tech Support/ System Admin >> Military computer systems
Military computer systems
|
60 posts back to top |
Posted about 1 year ago Does anyone know of good resources for military computer systems utilizing Unix? |
|
30 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Multix and its versions are what the Military uses. They have SCO Unix in their tanks and other vehicles (specialized of course). Then there is the NSA release of Linux (publicly available). Beyond that (I'm guessing on this one) they use some embedded Unix/Linux for their unmaned stuff. |
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Thanks for the info Skelton, that's more info than what I get from using the Tech Manuals which are VERY poorly written. LOL |
|
440 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Hehe The military has almost as many OSes as they have computers. Communication in the military is often sadly lacking, and coordination between projects is almost unheard of. Any time the military starts a new project, they tend to try and reinvent the wheel. (I should know, I spent 9 years in 2 different branches working with computers, and trying to change that practice.) Also, unless it's for actual real time tactical use, most of the military's computer systems are about 15 to 20 years obsolete, or at least they were when I was in. The only place you'll find bleeding edge technology is on the battlefield.
|
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Hey Phreadd, I've noticed that the computers systems are pretty diverse and very old. I'm in the national guard and some of ours have "died" becuase the battery went dead after sitting for a long time. The operating system itself has very little useful documentation too. It is a real time system reporting conditions, but it can only do that when the computers are operational! LOL Add all that to the fact that the information it sends out is through a complex network (again with little useful documentation) through a radio system and you feel like you are beating your head up against a wall when you try to explain to the CO why it's not working. |
|
157 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Now you know why "military intelligence" is an oxymoron. This is what you get when you let non-IT people run an IT department. I'm pretty sure Phreadd would agree - if the military ever wants it's network and computer systems to evolve out of the Jurassic period, they're going to have to turn to academia and professional civilian resources to do it. Lets just hope they have somebody around with brains enough to keep them away from Micro$oft and Smell... um, Dell. I had an uncle in the National Gaurd - he was a comptroller for the Central Nebraska regional HQ (now defunct) for almost 20 years. Roger used to tell me, "When you get your degree, come down to the unit and fix this crap, will ya?" Of course he was being facetious, but he griped about the computer systems constantly and I know he was wishing he could be serious about it. The last time I visited him while he was doing his "Weekend Warrior" duties - this was about 8 years ago - he showed me one of the office desktops. They were still running it on Windows 98! Not even 98 S.E.! I don't think I quit laughing until after I left the parking lot. |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago Hey slburKey, That is exactly where the Navy Base here in Panama City, Florida headed to: Microsoft on Dell Computer systems. In 2004, I was working deploying the new systems, and migrating the data off of the old, and training the users. As much as Microsoft is hacked, I was surprised that they went in that direction. I can understand the use of UNIX still by the military... It is so old that you don't have many person with knowledge to hack. Logic Girl |
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I'm still not exactly sure what OS is used, I kinda think Unix but the application itself is in Java. The hardware configuration itself is a nightmare, and when you try to troubleshoot communication issues, well, lets just say it's near impossible to do when you have everyone from a Battalion Commander on down trying to get a status report on when your system will be up. |
|
24 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I just put some furnaces and air-conditioners in a navy building. The IT guys from the navy still have not been there to install there computers but they are secretive about them. They also do not make connections outside the building. If they are so secretive then why is their information on software and operating systems available to the public? Why would they not have their own OS that is not detected to civilians? |
|
440 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago SUTTONDAVE1 says ...
Why are they so secretive? It could be partly because they are embarrassed to reveal just how antiquated the junk they are working on is. |
|
157 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago LogicGirl says ...
Alright, that's it! I'm moving to CANADA!!! What did I just say about "military intelligence"? Next you'll be telling me that this is going to cost the tax-payers on the order of the $700.00 NASA hammer?! Or is it the $10K toilet seat? Honestly, though, if they had been smart enough to use a UNIX based OS - or even one of the Linux derivatives - they'd have been far better off. MS is crap - unstable, leaks memory like a seive, uses resources like ... well, like the military, and we all know that Microsoft security ranks right up there with military intelligence in the oxymoron category. UNIX is still the most stable OS there is - in part because it IS so "old." I guess we could always hope that MS could develop that kind of stability once its been around for 50 years.... maybe. Assuming Steve-the butthead-Balmer doesn't run the company into the toilet first. |
|
8 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I work in the military. Most of our newer systems are Windows on Dell. There are the old standards of Server 2003 and Windows Xp Pro. Sun Micro makes some of the other OS. It is a Unix/Linux based system with a GUI overlay to make it user friendly. I still love the Unix/Linux systems. It is a shame that no one wants to learn them. Command line interface rocks. |
|
60 posts back to top |
| Posted about 1 year ago I remember being taught some of command line interface, but it was barely enough information to do anything you really needed to do. I guess I will have to learn Unix/Linux in order to understand the manuals. |

