News >> Browse Articles >> Business
News >> Browse Articles >> Entertainment
News >> Browse Articles >> Gadgets
Fox Delays DVD Releases at Redbox Rentals, Cites Loss of Revenue
Ryan Nakashima/AP
August 07, 2009
LOS ANGELES – Hollywood studios are split over Redbox, the $1-per-night DVD rental kiosk company: They could supply it with cheap wholesale discs and ride its massive growth, or starve it in the hopes of preserving higher-priced purchases.
News Corp.‘s 20th Century Fox fell on the side of starvation this week, joining General Electric Co.’s Universal Pictures, whose withholding of discs prompted a lawsuit.
On the flip side, Sony Corp.‘s movie division signed a five-year deal just last month to supply Redbox. As part of the deal, Redbox would get discs more cheaply but would have to destroy copies after their rental lives ended rather than sell them as “previously viewed” for $7 apiece, as it had done in the past.
Many other studios are taking a wait-and-see approach.
Although fans of the self-service vending machines won’t notice a difference, the approach is crucial to both Redbox and the studios.
Lack of studio supply forces Redbox to buy discs from regular retailers – just like an individual might go to Wal-Mart or Best Buy – cutting into profits and stifling its growth. The studios want to keep their consumers happy, but are concerned the cheap kiosks could erode demand for higher-priced DVD purchases, which are the lifeblood of the industry.
“I do not think this will destroy the film business, but it’s certainly a major issue over the next few years, especially if it continues to grow at the rate it’s growing,” Pali Capital analyst Rich Greenfield said. “Whether or not the titles get sold at the end of it, $1 a day does not help the entire movie industry.”
On Wednesday, Fox ordered its wholesale distributors to stop supplying Redbox until 30 days after movie discs are released for sale. The policy takes effect Oct. 27.
The studio said the move was intent on “maintaining the quality image and value perception of Fox movies.” News Corp. Chief Operating Officer Chase Carey said $1 rentals were “grossly undervaluing” its product.
Like Fox, Universal Pictures insisted on a 45-day delay, which Redbox refused, and the studio cut off Redbox’s supply last December. Redbox, a subsidiary of Bellevue, Wash.-based Coinstar Inc., sued to prevent Universal from stopping its supply, claiming antitrust laws had been broken. A federal judge in Delaware is expected to rule soon.
Redbox has 17,900 kiosks in the U.S. and plans 8,500 more this year. Netflix Inc. CEO Reed Hastings has said Redbox and other low-cost kiosk renters such as DVDPlay Inc. would be the biggest competitors to his mail-order DVD rental company by year’s end.
Redbox President Mitch Lowe is trying to convince studio executives that the machines help sell more movies and says more than a third of his customers rent movies before deciding to buy.
“From the studio executive’s perspective, they’ve always had an issue with the dollar price point,” Lowe said. “I think it’s been very positive to expanding consumers’ interest in film again.”
Redbox can still obtain DVDs without a studio’s cooperation. The “first sale” legal doctrine gives it the right to use the discs as it sees fit after buying them, just as someone buying a book at a retail store can resell it, lend it or simply throw it away (The law is different for intangible property like movie and music downloads).
“Redbox will employ alternative, proven acquisition channels to provide our customers with the same level of service, convenience and value they’ve come to expect,” the company said in a statement.
When Universal turned its distributors’ tap off last year, Redbox just bought the discs at retail outlets and rented them out anyway. The “first sale” doctrine isn’t in contention in the case with Universal. Rather, Redbox accuses Universal of breaking antitrust law in commanding distributors to withhold the sales.
margoose3
3 months ago
4 comments
ok? Why attack Redbox? What about blockbuster? You end up paying just over $1 per day the only difference is you initially pay for so many days (5 or 7) per day. As a matter of fact, the studios can rent thier films to theaters instead of selling them to them, then they can make more profit by re-renting while saving the theater industry as well by renting being cheaper than selling. I think they are hurting themselves.
cthenkhaus
3 months ago
102 comments
If you're saying Fox is greedy why didn't Universal get tossed in their as well? Who doesn't rent a movie first if they didn't see it in theatres? Honestly I use Redbox a few times a month and if I like the movie I make it a point to go buy it. So the industry gets paid twice from my end
PureEvil
3 months ago
196 comments
Wow fox are real greedy bastards.
dabear2u
3 months ago
8 comments
I can't think of an industry that needs a net wide boycott. They turn custormers into criminals, they shutdown innovation and they restrict artists with their monoply distribution system. The MPAA and the RIAA need to see the cost of these behaviors, but gee I need that new Coldplay cd or how can I live with out the new season of 24 dvds. Come on people, just don't buy it is that easy. Anyone have ideas on how to screw with these bullies?
digioz
3 months ago
112 comments
lol ... anytime someone offers cheap movie rentals there has to be a lawsuite. Just to make sure we all pay through the nose for a movie they make once but cash in on over and over again (kind of like Software Sales!).
Pete