News >> Browse Articles >> Business
Obama's Tax Plan Raises High-Tech Hackles
Michael Liedtke / Associated Press
May 05, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO – President Barack Obama’s plan to impose U.S. taxes on corporate America’s overseas profits threatens to open a big crater in the financial statements of technology companies.
While additional taxes are rarely popular, Obama’s decision to go after corporate earnings outside the United States is a particularly prickly subject for technology executives because the industry has been steadily boosting its overseas sales amid rising demand for its gadgetry and services.
If Obama’s proposal becomes law, the hard-hit companies would include tech bellwethers like Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM Corp., Cisco Systems Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google Inc. Each of those companies realized a benefit of more than $1 billion from lower foreign tax rates in their most recent fiscal years – an advantage that could lost if Obama is able to change the rules.
“It would be like an earthquake for high tech,” said Carl Guardino, chief executive of Silicon Valley Leadership Group, an industry trade association. “On a Richter scale of 1 to 10, this would be a 12.”
Collectively, HP, IBM, Cisco, Microsoft and Google lowered their tax bills by a combined $7.4 billion in their last fiscal years by taking advantage of lower tax rates outside the United States, according to an analysis by The Associated Press.
Through the years, these five tax companies have avoided U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on a combined $72 billion in undistributed earnings from their foreign operations.
While Obama’s proposal might not tax all the money U.S. companies keep overseas, it apparently would target a big chunk. Obama estimated his plan would raise a total of $210 billion, or an average of about $21 billion annually, over a 10-year period.
By reinvesting their earnings overseas, U.S. companies insulate themselves from much higher tax rates had the money been made in their home country.
Google, for instance, would have been hit with an effective tax rate of 45.2 percent instead of 27.8 percent last year if it hadn’t been able to capitalize on lower rates overseas, according to the Mountain View-based company’s annual report. Without the lower foreign rates, Google’s 2008 tax bill would have been $1.02 billion higher. Google’s income before taxes totaled $5.85 billion last year.
Obama has been strongly supported so far by Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who campaigned for the president last year and has subsequently served as a technology adviser.
jytheitguy
6 months ago
2 comments
Corporations do not pay taxes. Period. They pass them along to their customers. If you sell widgets for $10 and the government raises your taxes by 20% then your price is going to raise (think hard now) 20%.
"They should pay their fair share" Please provide me with that number. 10% 20% 30%? Government spending never goes down so taxes will always go up. Until the government learns to live within it's means (never going to happen) taxes will always go up. It's not hard - it's basic math. You voted for change.
Stangnj
6 months ago
4 comments
I agree with daveinri. Companies should pay their fair share. They should be taxed more if they have off-shored jobs. How much tax revenue is lost by those that are now unemployed so that the company could save a few bucks by off-shoring. And I'm not speaking of companies that sell overseas and have shell corporations to avoid taxes. I'm talking about good old US companies that have put thousands on the unemployment rolls by off-shoring. Its great that we now have the technology in place that allows more free time. I just never expected the free time to come from being unemployed. Corporations and the guys in the ivory towers running them really ought to start paying their fair share.
begge
6 months ago
20 comments
45.2% in taxes? What could cost 40% of our salary anyways? We should make a law to stop any further growth in taxation and cap the percentage.
daveinri
6 months ago
2 comments
Corporations should pay taxes that are do. I won't even get into the 'overseas's operations' part of this, because that issue is far more complex than the writer indicates. However, one thing is quite clear to me. American companies shoulld not be allowed to set up shell corporations in offshore accounts simply for the sake of avoiding taxes. Period.
narg
6 months ago
46 comments
27% up to 48%? Sounds like they are fixing the numbers to make it sound worse than it is. The final tax bill is never that high. There'll be a LOT of false statements about this, because the President is messing with big money, who has a lot of time and ability to fight back with all types of spin and rubbish. This is one of many things that need to change to reverse the foriegn deficit and the corporate and consumer's habits that are shrinking the American economy.