News >> Browse Articles >> Science
Tiny Invisibility Cloak Constructed
Kristy Erdodi / DailyTech
May 04, 2009
‘A tiny invisibility cloak has been developed, combining silicon and a carpet-like design.’ -
A tiny, unique cloak has been developed, demonstrating how silicon and a carpet-like design can take scientists even further in their explorations of invisibility.
The journal Nature Materials reported on the development, which was constructed based on a carpet-like design theory first described by Professor John Pendry, from Imperial College London, in 2008. Teams involved in its current production included Michal Lipson and her team at Cornell University and Xiang Zhang, along with his team at University of California, Berkeley.
Hosting a design that allows it to eliminate distortion from the shape of anything underneath it, the cloak enables light to bend around it, which creates the illusion of a flattened surface.
A silicon sheet measuring a few thousandths of a millimeter across and containing multiple miniature holes makes up the cloak, which “changes the local density” of the item placed beneath it, according to Professor Zhang.
“When light passes from air into water it will be bent, because the optical density, or refraction index, of the water is different to air,” Professor Zhang explained. “So by manipulating the optical density of an object, you can transform the light path from a straight line to any path you want.”
The key to changing the optical density in this case lies in the cloak’s holes, which optical light cannot see because they are smaller than the size of its wavelength. All optical light does see is a “sort of air-silicon mixture,” as Professor Zhang explained, which means that at least in terms of light’s view, the item’s density has been altered.
The recently constructed silicon sheet does not stand as the first attempt at invisibility through a cloak. For example, in early August of 2008, Researchers at the Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center at the University of California, Berkeley used nano-fishnet of metal layers and nanoscale silver wires to cloak 3D materials. The two separate teams involved in this project, which also relied on the bending of light, were led by Professor Zhang, as well.
Similar attempts at invisibility cloaks of the past have also included constructions made of metal, which highlights this current project’s significant step toward progression. Unlike metal, which allows for losses of light, silicon absorbs only a minimal amount. The new material enables scientists to move forward from some of the flaws that metal’s light loss can cause upon trying to achieve invisibility.
© 2009, DailyTech

ElSquid
5 months ago
4 comments
Ah, the Luddites are out in force again. The beauty of this potential technology is in its simplicity. And, as for military applications, it will be as usefull as Saran Wrap and as durable as well. A thin sheet of material will not stand up to field conditions for any application. And, just like microwave "phaser" weapons, we may have advanced more than you know. ;-)
phantasyconcepts
6 months ago
14 comments
As a hunter, I can see the practical side of this. Ever hear of a "duck blind"? The concept is simply to camouflage one's self from the animal's sight and allow them to pass by oblivious to the hunter's presence.
As someone who has received numerous speeding tickets, I see law enforcement benefits in the form of speed traps and the stakeout of suspected criminal activities.
As an ecologically minded individual, I see the adaptation of the duck blind idea to observe animals in their own environment.
As a homeowner, I see this as a way to improve home construction by making the house blend into the surroundings a little better.
As a person with a dubious past, I see this as a way to hide things like illegal distilleries, fields of non-legal plant life, and ugly fat people at nudist colonies (not illegal, but it should be).
So, in these ways, I see invisibility as more of a benefit than something diabolical. I mean, who has seen the "face of God" and yet so many people worship and adore that being than fear it? You can't see live yogurt cultures, but you know they are good for you. You can't see Oxygen, but you know you need it. You can't see freedom, a soul, honesty, or love, but you are not afraid of them. No, there is nothing to fear but fear itself. FDR was right about that.
shineon
6 months ago
2 comments
Yet by simply observing the process of bending the light, this cloaking process, it's properties and behavior can change significantly. I wonder...how this cloaking technology might behave if unobserved?
lisaine
6 months ago
2 comments
Imagining using this technology to make a human or other large object invisible is a far stretch of the imagination, I think. Scale down your expectations and imagine putting that cloak onto security cameras. Only criminals would want to defeat that measure, because repair techs would already be able to do so. We already have one-way mirrors, why couldn't that concept also be applied to this cloak? Shape the "carpet" so that it's a cloak from the outside, yet still allow light/vision from the inside.
Can you imagine what this could do for the auto repair industry? Magically remove all those ugly scratches and dents in seconds! :) No need for the car to "see" outward from under the cloak, either. It truly depends on what the resulting cloaked surface looks like to the casual observer.
The possibilities of this technology truly are endless, if you apply a little more imagination!
Justen
6 months ago
212 comments
If the nano-holes have to be spaced to a particular wavelength it just means a different wavelength does *not* work with it. Manufacturing something like this has got to be prohibitively expensive compared to technology that allows you to see in other wavelengths. To put this in perspective, even if you imagine for a moment that it only costs $1000 to make a full suit of this stuff it still costs 1/5th that for cheap infrared ("night vision") binoculars. Shifting the spectrum farther is likely to be more expensive, but in reality it'll be much, much more expensive to make the stuff no matter what the cost is proportionately. Not to mention there are a thousand ways to detect presence non-visually. Outfitting any security system or security force to deal with the occasional invisible invader only adds a marginal expense, especially since many are already built/trained to deal with low or no-visibility scenarios.
In short, bfd. Invisibility is science fiction and about as practical and useful as anti-gravity mixing bowls.
juan2000
6 months ago
2 comments
I am fascinated with such technological wonders Star Trek. I take pride in what people can do. However, I would keep us all aware of two things about how the science and military-industrial complex selects avenues of exploration.
(1) What is the end result of this advancement? Is it to enable war machines to increase its killing abilities? Is it just entertaining? is it advancing theory that may have beneficial effects?
(2) Is this development aligned with our human and planetary priorities which include, for example, preventing the destruction of ecosystems and eliminating poverty, over-population, and mass ignorance? These are truly difficult problems. I would ask our young future scientists to apply their genius to really difficult problems; not simple things like cloaking devices, but the warp engine of humanity's heart and mind with no one left behind.
An invisibility cloak does not seem to score well by these metrics. In the spirit of science, however, if there is some other fruitful potential toward improving our understanding of electromagnetic phenomena, such as solar energy, by all means let include it in such articles.
Bueno Suerte
scotlynhatt
6 months ago
30 comments
The need to see what you are doing will always be an issue when attempting to actively camouflage yourself or some object but the application for tactical invisibility is fairly good. Think about what Lockheed went through in this situation http://thinkorthwim.com/2007/08/19/1034/
loipex107
6 months ago
32 comments
Nothing new..Its been done many decades ago, They are slowly bringing it in into the mainstream...do not be fooled by the games "they" play with us common folks.
cthenkhaus
6 months ago
102 comments
But if you can't see through it and you want to use it to conceal something then would radar work through it? I'm imagining something like how a submarine guides itself.
begge
6 months ago
20 comments
This also means anything inside could not see out, because any light would be bent around it. Such a thing might be used to block light sensitive things from receiving light, or another version might be used to block radiation (or to allow airline hijackers to conceal weapons). Or maybe by changing the density you could filter certain wavelenghts of light.
Enabler
6 months ago
2902 comments
This definitely exciting, but also very scary. Yet another example of technology as a dual edged sword.