News >> Browse Articles >> Networking
More ISPs Testing Broadband Data Caps
Michael Barkoviak / DailyTech
February 08, 2009
‘It seems more ISPs are willing to test broadband data caps that subscribers must adhere to if they don’t want to pay extra for their Internet service.’ -
After becoming the first major U.S. internet service provider (ISP) to experiment with charging customers if they exceeded a predetermined broadband usage cap, Time Warner Cable is expanding its broadband cap to several other markets.
Despite criticism, Time Warner says it has a system in place that is able to accurately meter and bill ISP subscribers depending on how much bandwidth they use per month over the allotted cap. Four new cities will help the company test broadband caps, but the company did not reveal which cities have been selected.
Many internet users who simply check email and browse the internet are likely safe from exceeding a broadband cap, but as more consumers begin to watch streaming content and download higher amounts of data, there has been a lot of controversy regarding data caps.
Charter Communications also will test new bandwidth caps on its subscribers, with the cap depending on what plan subscribers are using. Subscribers with internet speeds up to 15 Mbps per month will have a cap of 100GB, while subscribers with up to 25 Mbps per month will have a cap of 250GB.
Subscribers who have up to 60 Mbps will not have a broadband cap, multiple news publications learned.
“More than 99 percent of current Charter Internet customers use less bandwidth than the threshold allows and therefore will not need to change their surfing habits in any manner,” a Charter spokesperson recently said.
Comcast also has increased internet speeds up to 50 Mbps for some subscribers, though there is a 250GB limit per month – which some internet users can approach a bit faster than they would like.
Critics said bandwidth caps discourage people from using all of the benefits of the internet while also hurting online video and streaming web sites which have become legitimate contenders against TVs.
ISPs that haven’t publicly tested broadband caps are likely patiently waiting to see how Time Warner, Charter and other companies handle their tests before launching similar initiatives.
© 2009, DailyTech

techiehelp
9 months ago
2 comments
nice 2 know-- i am on the internet a lot
jrolader
9 months ago
32 comments
This is awful…we're advancing backwards! One of the main selling points of broadband (compared to dial-up) back in the day was unlimited minutes, and now they want to take that away -- talk about bait and switch! These companies clearly do not have a strong customer focus. What customers want is to be able to get online and use their PC without thinking or worrying about their usage. I can't imagine getting near the end of the month and having to consciously avoid the Internet because I'm near my limit from something I downloaded earlier in the month. Boycott any company that does this!
a3etech
9 months ago
2 comments
pathetic. why don't we use dail up if they are to cap it
a3e-tech
NMc
9 months ago
2144 comments
boo!
skelton
9 months ago
46 comments
Generally I would simply shop for a provider that gives me bandwidth with no caps, but with the understanding that there would be minimums and periods of bursts. If you are willing to pay extra and get a static IP address (Verizon does this) you can then use all the pipe that you have on your home connection. Either way, bandwidth is expensive and it will come with a price.
doglick
9 months ago
18 comments
I exceed the cap as a single user watching streaming movies that I PAY FOR!. The newest truck time warner is using is to increase packet error for netflix. It started about 3 weeks ago. I get one bad net packet every second only while watching netflix movies. The timing is too regular to be 'random' and only happens to netflix streaming. As a customer that is easily part of the so called one percent users that exceed the monthly amount I am pissed. I bet their usage limits are closer to 10 percent of customers. With a house full of teanagers all gaming and watching streaming video, the bandwidth cap is a real pain. This is about greed and control, not infrastructure problems. The largest city in the state is 65K people. There is no issue with bandwith usage here but they are still limiting the users. I am willing to bet that the top bandwidth people are not as much a majority as they cry fowl against. Where are the 'real' statistics? Not what they tell us but what is actually happening?
Deathrow_Nzl
9 months ago
38 comments
You guys Should consider yourselves Lucky, I live in New Zealand Our plans are limited to 1GB,5GB,10GB,20GB,40GB or 80GB a Month.. & they are very expensive... We can only dream of being able to download 250GB in a month..
Most people are on either the 1GB a month or 5GB a month plans as the 5GB plan is already $50..
This is almost entirely Because our telecommunications company has a monopoly over our cellphones,Internet & Telephones & keep bribing our government officials to stay out there way..
Account Removed
9 months ago
Sorry about that!! Dude!! Google : http://www.indiabroadband.net/
albertalbs
9 months ago
4 comments
no reply... about Indian ISPs.... very bad...
Account Removed
9 months ago
Good point Lokeusa ;-) I think the best solution is for ISP to have as much field tech who install and secure it, it is more important than phone support, seriously, this would be great. Customer would be happy, and they wouldn't have to deal with the annoying Geek Squad, you can't imagine how they get frustrated on the phone with someone, the insults are flying pretty high... O_O
Otherwise...
Wifi !! LOL !!! Especially with Comcast it looks alwauys unprotected, my neighbor from Turkey got her router wide open, at the garage where my bro-in-law go do some mechanic works, the Wifi point of the neighbour is also wide open. It is a Lynksis router. LOL!!!
At least Verizon already got WEP protection with their Westell Modem/router, not the hardest to break, some 15 years old can break it in 5 minutes watch youtube. LOL!!! But at least it is unbreakable for someone "normal".
Give a laptop to your 16 years old daughter if your home network doesn't work properly and if no one set up the wireless LAN, she going to click on the taskbar and find out some Wireless Network, without knowing anything, she is going to double click on the closet network and she "fixed" the internet :-D LOL!!! But totally doesn't know why it is so slow... I've seen this...
Totally innocent and AIMing with friend about her sweet 16 with the neighbor Wifi.
LOL!!! You can see everything this days!!
lokeusa
9 months ago
6 comments
added comment to below with microsoft and all there bugs it is easy to push those limits microsoft demands your computer connect at three o clock am to check for security updates with caps like these people wont be able to afford to update considering your averedge service pack is now several gigs and microsofts in ability to produce a stable product bottom line there are several directions i could take in the matter and plan to make it a primary dispute to stop these caps everyone should be contacting congress and putting there foot through the door lets outlaw the caps.
lokeusa
9 months ago
6 comments
i beleive that these data caps ecouradge wifi theft and acess theft it tells people to take from those who havent exceeded yet. i personally do not support it todays home networks arent secure enouf to integrate these mesures if they intend to do this then people need to be traind by the componies to secure there networks so unauthorized acess doesnt happen and a bottom line its always about more money the more greed they have tha more they will push
Account Removed
9 months ago
Thumbs down !!
Account Removed
9 months ago
My first message disappeared, Wireless WIMAX and FIOS are hi-tech compared to cable, they need to cut their cap to be a little more attractive, cable companies don't real good deal.
They should be happy and graceful local government let them install their coax network, btw, not true full-duplex, YUCK!
skelton
9 months ago
46 comments
Any administrator that is worth their salt should know the number of users on a network and the available bandwidth for those users. It is an easy thing to configure a router to put priories on certain traffic and to low-priority other traffic. That includes cutting off traffic of certain streaming protocols to allow for e-mail or other key traffic areas. You also get smart and use proxies and cache a lot of the content locally to prevent overrun of your external link to the world.
I have Verizon and they have no proxy. And these cable companies would do good to install mini-servers in developments to handle proxy and caching. Many companies make fanless systems in which you could invest in Solid State Hard Disks, and have in such a harsh environment. Or do like the cell phone companies and pay for space to hang a server in a controlled area in someone's home. (or add a service shed to the property).
Makes me wonder why these companies demand certifications and college degrees when they refuse to hire those with real world experience and hire no-experience support techs, who haven't a clue.