News >> Browse Articles >> Entertainment

News >> Browse Articles >> Tech Law

+1

RIAA Ends its Lawsuit Crusade

RIAA Ends its Lawsuit Crusade

Shane McGlaun / DailyTech

December 19, 2008

RIAA says that any pending litigation will continue.’ -

The RIAA has been suing people willy-nilly for years with slim proof that the defendants actually shared music illegally. The lawsuits often seemed to be nothing more than a marketing attempt by the RIAA to get people to realize they could and would sue if you illegally shared music or they suspected you did.

Despite all of the suits that the RIAA filed, against people living and dead, the tide of music piracy never turned in its favor. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) cites numbers from the NPD Group that show illegal music sharing stayed about the same throughout the RIAA’s inquisition.

This week, The WSJ reported that the RIAA has announced it will stop its slash and burn suit policy and focus on other methods of preventing piracy that is thinks will be more effective. Since the RIAA started is massive campaign of litigation, it has brought legal proceedings against 35,000 people.

The RIAA says that it will now focus on working with individual ISPs to help stop piracy. When a person on an ISP is suspected of pirating music the RIAA will send an email to the ISP, who can then get with the individual customer to try to stop piracy. As is par for the RIAA’s course, it makes no mention of how exactly it will gather evidence of piracy against ISP customers. Many wonder if the RIAA will simply resort to massive spamming of hundreds of thousands of suspected file sharers to ISPs.

If an ISP determines that a user is sharing music illegally, it will send an email warning the customer to begin with. That warning, if unheeded, could be followed by more warning letters from the ISP. If the user fails to stop file sharing, their internet connection could be slowed or terminated altogether.

The bad news for alleged file shares that already have RIAA litigation pending against them is that The WSJ says the RIAA will proceed with pending suits. That means that the retrial date set for the tossed verdict in the Jammie Thomas case will continue.

New York State Attorney General Andre Cuomo is also working to broker a deal between the RIAA and ISPs to help address both parties’ privacy concerns. One key point in the RIAAs new tact on piracy is that it will not ask for the names of alleged music traders.

Cuomo’s chief of staff Steven Cohen told The WSJ, “We wanted to end the litigation. It’s not helpful.” For its part, the RIAA thinks that the new policy will reach more people to make them aware that the man has an eye on them. RIAA group chairman Mitch Bainwol said, “Part of the issue with infringement is for people to be aware that their actions are not anonymous.”

Brian Toder, the attorney representing a woman from Minnesota in a file sharing case said, “I’d give them credit for stopping what they’ve already been doing because it’s been so destructive.” Unfortunately, for his client, her litigation will continue despite the new policy.

© 2008, DailyTech


+1
  • 1549644963_l_max50

    ddeambra

    11 months ago

    28 comments

    When I worked for an ISP from 02-04 this was our policy. We would take a copyright complaint at face value and turn off the user's access until he either A) admitted that he was sharing, removed the content and electronically signed a form indicating that this was going on his "permanent record", or B) got the complainer to revoke the complaint. If you signed the form twice and we got a third complaint, you were permanently turned off and could no longer get access through our ISP.

    It was a little jack-booted since we did NO research at all into validity of complaints and required all people to take responsibility for neighbors sharing on their unsecured wireless. On the other hand, it kept us from getting sued by the RIAA and their ilk.

  • Me_max50

    jh443

    11 months ago

    22 comments

    There's one thing to remember about NPD Group's numbers - they come from admissions of those they survey. All that can be said with any degree of certainty is that the number of people who ADMITTED to sharing files remained fairly constant. I'd put money that there was far more sharing than even NPD knows about.

  • N38311722_32485742_8393_max50

    mjrevel

    11 months ago

    6 comments

    That seems like a much better idea than sueing everyone. I'm a bit confused though because last time I checked this policy has been in effect with my current ISP. I've received a few emails from them regarding online piracy, nothing but a warning email, but still a warning none the less.

What's the Scoop?

Post a link to something interesting from another site, or submit your own original writing for the InsideTech community to read.

Report News Here

IT Career Advice

Sf-skyline-main_sq32

Top 25 Cities for Tech Jobs

Now more than ever, it’s important to get the best bang for your buck. And there’s no question about ...

Hotcareers-250_sq32

10 Recession-Proof IT Careers

Companies are cutting back spending, shrinking staff sizes, and making tough layoffs at a rate that most of us ...

50books_sq32

50 Books Every Geek Should Read

Ever find out one of your friends hasn't read "Neuromancer" or doesn't know what a Babelfish is or why ...

Recent Activity

Meinblack_max30
ZeroDayExploit posted in: "Dating and Relationship Tips", 29 minutes ago.
Meinblack_max30
ZeroDayExploit posted in: "Think Fast Let it Pass", about 1 hour ago.
Meinblack_max30
ZeroDayExploit posted in: "Singles Bar", about 1 hour ago.
Photo_user_blank_big
editor gave a thumbs up to The Article "A Few Ways to Save Money While Holiday Shopping", about 1 hour ago.
Dscf0431_max30
cyril commented on: "David Harris", about 1 hour ago.