News >> Browse Articles >> Phones
Senator Probes Rising Text Message Costs
Associated Press / AP Online
September 10, 2008
WASHINGTON – A key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee is asking the nation’s top four wireless carriers to justify the “sharply rising rates” they charge people to send and receive text messages.
In letters to top executives at Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp. and T-Mobile, Wisconsin Democrat Herb Kohl said Tuesday that he is concerned that rising text messaging rates reflect decreasing competition in the wireless business.
Kohl chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights. His inquiry comes as European Commission regulators are threatening to impose a cap on roaming fees for text messages sent by Europeans traveling outside of their home nations, in an effort to force prices down by as much as 70 percent.
Kohl said he was concerned that consumers are paying more than 20 cents per message, up from 10 cents in 2005. This increase, he said, “does not appear to be justified by rising costs in delivering text messages,” which are small data files that are inexpensive for carriers to transmit.
Kohl said he is particularly concerned that all four of the companies appear to have adopted identical price increases at nearly the same time. “This conduct is hardly consistent with the vigorous price competition we hope to see in a competitive marketplace,” he wrote.
Kohl also noted that these rate hikes have occurred during the industry’s recent consolidation, which has reduced the number of national wireless carriers in the U.S. to four from six. That consolidation continues, he said, as the large national wireless carriers buy out smaller, regional competitors – as evidenced most recently by Verizon Wireless’ planned acquisition of Alltel Corp. for $5.9 billion plus the assumption of $22.2 billion in debt.
Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC, said it will respond to Kohl’s letter once it has had a chance to review it. AT&T said it has received the letter and will respond accordingly, and Sprint said “we look forward to responding to the Senator’s inquiry about the text messaging options we offer our customers and we will fully cooperate with his request.”
T-Mobile, which is owned by Deutsche Telekom AG, said it will fully cooperate with Senator Kohl’s requests.
© 2008, YellowBrix, Inc. 
BugaBoo
12 months ago
46 comments
Does Sen. Kohl have teens who text a lot?
I don't text because of the extra cost. If I do, it'd only be because it was vital at the time. Period!
Before texting, teens used to run up landline phone biils. Seems like "the more things change the more they're the same."
Anyway, when certain activities use more resources, they cost someone more. The only question is "Whom?" For example, see the articles on bandwidth usage restrictions. There is a case where carriers are trying to keep the networks open for everyone. If too many of their customers couldn't get on because of "bandwidth hogs," then they would begin to lose business.
It costs $$$ to expand capacity. So another question is, are the carriers dedicating a significant portion of the fees for texting or excess bandwidth usage to expand capacity?
sclose
about 1 year ago
2 comments
indeed P.G. os wrong but it will always be a factor in daily life. sad
NMc
about 1 year ago
2144 comments
true mikeD, but when you have 2 kids that spend a good deal amount of time texting, $0.20 adds up. what's wrong with trying to get the best price possible for anything we purchase? whether it's gasoline or texting, price gouging is wrong....right???
MikeD
about 1 year ago
866 comments
Paying $0.20 cents or more for a text message is nothing compared to having to pay nearly $5.00 a gallon for gas. When you compare that to the cost of the bullshit war we are in, it's all trivial.
scastle
about 1 year ago
62 comments
I think the Senator should be focusing on more important issues.
inquisitivedzign
about 1 year ago
10 comments
It is just another prime example of industry monopoly. How many industries have top ranking CEOs that communicate to control the market? The answer is alot. The fact is that competition just isn't much of a factor as much as availability anymore...most companies in most industries...well the 4main leaders at least generally have comparable services and prices...the only question is availability and convenience. For instance do you think that gas costs are really at a level that only provide the companies in control with minimal profit..? Hell no why do you think those CEOs make tens of millions each year? They communicate to fix prices all at competitive prices...within cents of each other...but the general rise is enough to boost all controlling salaries. The hit is on the consumer. No such thing as honest business anymore. That is why I am working on becoming a software developer...I plan on creating teams of talented people to work on Linux distros that are free in order to replace windows....and great games that can run on linux without stupid emulation programs or WINE. We shall see. Down with big business!!!! Time for businesses to start taking consumers seriously
Chrisdafrenchie
about 1 year ago
248 comments
screw this!!